[Standards-JIG] FW: Jingle - P2P and PBX calls
simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca
Fri Jan 6 15:27:48 UTC 2006
I agree mostly with your statements except for the fact I think it
definitely IS important that a system should be in place where the
gateway does not require XMPP server modifications.
For example. When I install MSN gateway, I do not need any MSN specific
code in the XMPP server source.
I know I am not familiar of servers outside of Jabberd but I think this
is a very important problem for gateways. Gateways are external
components and shouldn't require XMPP server modifications.
Now if the gateway itself handled JEP55, this is cleared up except for
the problem of:
How does your client know which gateway to search for what? Or should a
client basically query all gateways via Discovery JEP for JEP55 support,
then during the search, basically search every gateway that supports
If this is how clients should act then everything is fine and dandy :)
Tomahawk Technologies Inc.
103 Victoria Street TEL: 613-257-4141 x:290
Carleton Place, ON FAX: 613-257-8142
Canada simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca
K7C 2W5 www.tomahawk.ca
From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org
[mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Louis
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:06 AM
To: standards-jig at jabber.org
Subject: RE:[Standards-JIG] FW: Jingle - P2P and PBX calls
As for JEP55 support, the XMPP does not have to store the data for the
profile. It needs to have access to it, which is slightly different. As
very simple example in many cases profile data is held in some LDAP or
store. It is up to the server to gather this information and make it
available to the client using JEP55. The XMPP server acts as a proxy in
case. Similarly, retrieving the information from a PBX directory is also
possible as long as the PBX exposes some sort of interfaces that the
server can query and then cache the results. It's a matter of
implementation, and in this case you may want to widen your selection of
servers outside Jabberd only.
The same applies to a gateway to the PBX (the Jingle-IAX gateway you
mentioned) Actually the XMPP server will expose the JIDs that can be
searched by JEP55 when queried through JEP30 disco. In this case the
itself would have to implement the JEP55 support, but implementation
is no different from having the server do it (I mean it would be the
code, just a different service JID). Implementing the JEP55 support in
gateway would be beneficial in your case as it would be independent of
XMPP server (usually gateways/transports are connected as components on
Finally, if you can address "things which are not users, such as
or emergency services" through a JID you can reach them XMPP stanzas.
it is a matter of addressing by the gateway. In the case of a Jingle
my bet is that it will implement something like
phone-number at jingle.foo.bar
as an addressing scheme.
In the end you'll have a system where any XMPP client supporting JEP55
almost all of them) will allow to search for any phone or emergency
number. Afterwards, it will all depend of the client capability: if it
Jingle enabled, you may place a call directly, otherwise you would have
use a black phone...
In short you see that you may not need DTMF extensions to Jingle to get
result you expect ;)
Hope it helps
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:30:05 -0500
From: "Simon Guindon" <simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca>
Subject: RE: [Standards-JIG] FW: Jingle - P2P and PBX calls
To: "Jabber protocol discussion list" <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Message-ID: <3E6F9E04F4CF864DBCC3EECB90FDFB502904C6 at BART>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
About JEP-55. This would require the XMPP server to specifically store
values that we require, which most would not I assume. Since it is the
server responding to the search and not the Jingle gateway.
For example if a IAX gateway speaks Jingle, so iax.server.com then the
IAX server is the one that knows what their phone # is, not XMPP server.
Would the proper method to be searching the main server or would it be
better to search using the same JEP but the destination JID be
iax.server.com instead of server.com?
When you say the server will communicate with the PBX to gather this
information. How does that work? Does that mean for example jabberd's
code has to be altered internally in addition of a gateway?
I think the ideal situation is if someone writes an IAX or Asterisk or
SIP gateway for Jingle, all you require is install it, and not
modifications to specific XMPP servers on top of that.
Or am I missing something?
Also about "411" or "yellow/white pages" service. What about things
which are not users, such as voicemail or emergency services etc?
More information about the Standards