[Standards-JIG] Stream compression (JEP-138) and notificationof failure or success (repost from JSF Members)

Sebastiaan Deckers cbas at pandion.be
Wed Jan 11 17:41:55 UTC 2006


Alright, you guys win. :-)

-- 
Sebastiaan



Peter Millard wrote:

>Agreed.. With implementations already working and inter-oping, it
>seems just clarifying the JEP is in order, not breaking all of these
>inter-oping clients and servers :)
>
>pgm.
>
>On 1/11/06, JD Conley <jd.conley at coversant.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>>Maybe changing it to <success/> would be better, but I wonder how much
>>>we're really gaining by changing the element name.
>>>      
>>>
>>I agree. At this point we have at least seven compatible implementations
>>of the current protocol. Clarifying the wording would be best.
>>
>>-JD Conley
>>



More information about the Standards mailing list