[Standards-JIG] message types

Hal Rottenberg halr9000 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 14:56:10 UTC 2006

On 7/3/06, Nolan Eakins <sneakin at semanticgap.com> wrote:
> Personally, I would like to see the type attribute be extensible. I
> think the RFCs hard code what the allowable types are eliminating any
> future new types. I'm sure we could come up with uses for new types.

Like JEP-0183 (http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0183.html).

Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:hal at jabber.rocks.cc

More information about the Standards mailing list