[Standards-JIG] JEP-0080 (geoloc) and JEP-0112 (physloc) merge

Joe Hildebrand hildjj at gmail.com
Wed Jul 19 15:05:26 UTC 2006

I don't have any problem with re-merging them.  I think the idea was  
that you might want to separate the access control lists for the  
syntax for your location from the semantics of your location.

On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Ralph Meijer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've been talking to Boris Mann and we think that geolocation and
>> physical location (address) are intrinsically coupled. They should  
>> not
>> diverge, although either could be optional. See [1].
>> We are wondering why these two JEP got separated again after  
>> having been
>> merged. Joe, do you remember? Are there any objections to joining  
>> them?
>> [1] http://www.bmannconsulting.com/blog/bmann/jabber-geeking-merge- 
>> jep-0080-and-jep-0112
> I recall that we merged and de-merged the specs several times back in
> the old days, but I can't quite remember why they ended up de- 
> merged. It
> always nags at me a bit that they are separate, so I don't think I  
> would
> have objections to re-merging them. But I'll think about it some more.
> /psa

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1883 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060719/0225b583/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list