[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0080 (geoloc) and JEP-0112 (physloc) merge

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jul 19 20:04:32 UTC 2006


Remko Troncon wrote:
>> with greater precision, but the precision issue is orthogonal to the
>> syntax issue, I think.
> 
> Well, in PEP you only have one node per namespace, so the permissions
> on that node are the permissions you get on all of the parts of geoloc.
> On the other hand, in PEP all permissions should be the same anyway
> (based on presence subscription), so it doesn't matter in that case.

Sure. But if you want really fine-grained control over who gets to see
what, you're not going to be using PEP anyway, since it is a simplified
subset of the full pubsub protocol. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060719/b1c2c6ae/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list