[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0163: further PEP simplification

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Jul 27 06:47:16 UTC 2006


Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> 
> On Jul 26, 2006, at 3:58 AM, Ian Paterson wrote:
>> Even so, I can live without JEP-0060-style subscriptions for the
>> non-Presence access models in JEP-0163 (the subscription protocol
>> could be retrofitted quite easily for these cases if we decide we need
>> it).
> 
> There's no reason why a PEP-enabled presence service couldn't also allow
> JEP-60-style subscriptions *also*, for people that don't have access to
> presence.

That's right. In addition, I think a server should return different
disco#items results depending on whether the requesting entity has a
presence subscription to the bare JID. But I'll describe all this more
fully in the next version of JEP-0163.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060726/44147de5/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list