[Standards-JIG] message types
Michal vorner Vaner
michal.vaner at kdemail.net
Wed Jun 28 17:55:56 UTC 2006
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:48:04PM +0200, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> On 6/28/06, Hal Rottenberg <halr9000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>As we all know we have three message types:
> >>Are we going to do something usefull with it?
> >Sorry, have to totally disagree with you here. I enjoy the
> >distinction and in fact use all 3 every day.
> Hal, it's not a matter of taking sides - I'm just discussing possibilities.
> On 6/28/06, Michal vorner Vaner <michal.vaner at kdemail.net> wrote:
> >Well, I use the normal mail-like messages sometimes, for more formal
> So, if we want to keep the "type" semantics, to mark the type of a message
> we should extend it at least by a "notification" type, for pub-sub
> node change notifications.
> Now they are unrecognizable from normal plain messages.
Why sould we not keep them? Are they causing any trouble?
Aren't they missing the <body/> element? Actually, the type should be
specific to the body more than the message itself in my opinion, but I
do not see it a good reason to change it all. If the message is
something that does not show at all, then the type does not matter, if I
> >Then we maybe could define such protocol to retrieve only the mail-like.
> We could extend JEP-0013 to show "type" while browsing and accept
> "type" while fetching.
Update the JEP, if you think it is needed.
> >However, they are different from chat only the way how they show.
> Not only. Messages deliver <subject/> and chats deliver <thread/>.
Which AFAIK is omitted most of the time.
> >And headlines are not stored offline anyway.
> What do you say? Mine are stored. :-)
They are supposed not to be stored, as headlines are usually short-term
notices. They are not stored on jabber.cz servers. I read somewhere they
SHOULD NOT, which means they may be stored but you need a good reason to
do it that way.
> >Why couldn't I have headline looking email-like message?
> What do you mean? Could explain more?
Well, something that has a subject and body. It would be the same in the
xml, and the poor client would not know how to show it.
There are two types of optimizations. The ones which make the program
slower and the ones which make the user red by missing features.
Michal "vorner" Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards