[Standards-JIG] Re: LAST CALL: JEP-0172 (User Nickname)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon May 1 17:26:57 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Remko Troncon wrote:
> 
> On 28 Apr 2006, at 20:42, JEP Editor wrote:
> 
>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for JEP-0172 (User
>> Nickname).
> 
> I'm not sure i like the following sentence in Section 4.5: "If a client
> does not support JEP-0060 or the subset thereof specified in JEP-0163,
> it MAY send one <message/> stanza to each of its contacts, containing
> the updated nickname". I'm affraid clients will be getting unsolicited
> information, which is exactly what we wanted to avoid by introducing
> PEP. I would rather have the JEP be strict: no PEP, no nickname updates.

Yes, at some point we need to "bite the bullet" and tell people to use
pubsub/PEP. I'm just not sure exactly when that point is...

P

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEVkTgNF1RSzyt3NURAsgqAKCpg236klAXDhtFFnn2dBRpkEFuLgCfSfdk
vseyVPBrVzsVVpqbpS9s7OQ=
=NfiV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list