[Standards-JIG] Re: LAST CALL: JEP-0172 (User Nickname)
jadestorm at nc.rr.com
Mon May 1 18:10:13 UTC 2006
May I ask that someone specify pubsub/pep use within this JEP?
Section 4.5 mentions that pubsub/pep ought to be used, BUT it doesn't
provide any examples or real information regarding it's use. I
basically "made something up" for the moment which may or may not be
good. =) (I'm trying to implement all of this with PyICQ/PyAIM)
Anyway, basically I stored this:
Seemed reasonable enough. Might be stupid, might not. =D Either
way, if pubsub/pep is going to be suggested in the JEP, I'd love to
see an example of storing it in pubsub/pep listed. (or is this
implied somewhere that I'm not seeing?)
On May 1, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Remko Troncon wrote:
> On 01 May 2006, at 19:26, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Yes, at some point we need to "bite the bullet" and tell people to
>> pubsub/PEP. I'm just not sure exactly when that point is...
> Well, that statement can be turned around: for years, every feature
> that could be done through PubSub (even if it was far fetched) and
> that didn't was shot down without further discussion. Is it a good
> time to stop doing it now, now that a usable version of pubsub is
> finally emerging ? ;-)
> Anyway, i agree: as long as PEP isn't draft, you can't enforce it.
More information about the Standards