[Standards-JIG] Re: Re: JEP-0060: delete + retract?

Gaston Dombiak gaston at jivesoftware.com
Thu May 4 19:11:46 UTC 2006


Hey Peter,

I like the syntax. May be in order to be backwards compatible the default 
should be true? Unless we really want to not send notifications by default. 
:)'

  -- Gato

"Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote in message 
news:445A4CE7.1010307 at jabber.org...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> So:
>
> <retract notify='true|false'>
>
> And default to false?
>
> Peter
>
> Gaston Dombiak wrote:
>> Hey Peter,
>>
>> I agree that under certain circumstances it would be useful to not send
>> notifications when deleting items. If this is special case of deletion 
>> then
>> I think that we can use the existing "verb" retract where by default it 
>> will
>> send notifications unless it includes some flag that indicates the 
>> opposite.
>> IMHO, reducing the number of verbs is a nice way to keep things simple
>> (without making each verb very complex ;) ).
>>
>> Just my 2 cents.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>   -- Gato
>>
>> "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote in message
>> news:445A2BEF.2060702 at jabber.org...
>> We need to decide whether to differentiate between "delete item" and
>> "retract item" ( = delete with notification) in publish-subscribe. I
>> agree with Alexander Gnauck that it would be good to have separate and
>> distinct operations for these two concepts:
>>
>> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards-jig/2006-April/010691.html
>>
>> If there are no objections (Gaston, Ralph, Matt, Bob?), I will add this
>> to 1.8pre16.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFEWkznNF1RSzyt3NURAj59AJ4gjCabtRjL5FhWfHeQ9tm+2ideJgCfRQL0
> pKZA2pDrmJgONUpquFUG9wI=
> =o+RA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 






More information about the Standards mailing list