[Standards-JIG] pubsub: wrapper or no wrapper for subscription authorizations?

Ralph Meijer jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu
Fri May 5 13:17:41 UTC 2006


On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:15:41PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> In 1.8pre14 I changed it to have a wrapper element (based on some
> feedback from Peter Millard) but I think it makes sense to change it
> back unless people can provide a good reason for the wrapper element.

What was Peter's reasoning about adding the wrapper? It seems to me that
we used non-wrapped forms here so that clients that have generic
JEP-0004 support can be used to boot. I don't see the added value of a
wrapper.

-- 
Groetjes,

ralphm



More information about the Standards mailing list