[Standards-JIG] RFCs in pretty formats
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri May 5 15:36:00 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Fri May 05 04:18:33 2006, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
>> P.S. Why is it so hard to find RFCs in TOC-hyperlinked format?
> Because the RFC standard format is text, so that's the one you generally
> have to cite, or refer to in most cases. This might be changing - the
> source format is usually xml2rfc, these days, so that might eventually
> get equal status.
See http://www.xmpp.org/specs/ for the XMPP RFCs in HTML format.
Naturally I wrote them using the XML format defined in RFC 2629.
That won't help you for non-XMPP specs, though. ;-)
Jabber Software Foundation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards