[Standards-JIG] RFCs in pretty formats

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri May 5 15:36:00 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Fri May 05 04:18:33 2006, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
>> P.S. Why is it so hard to find RFCs in TOC-hyperlinked format?
> 
> Because the RFC standard format is text, so that's the one you generally
> have to cite, or refer to in most cases. This might be changing - the
> source format is usually xml2rfc, these days, so that might eventually
> get equal status.

See http://www.xmpp.org/specs/ for the XMPP RFCs in HTML format.
Naturally I wrote them using the XML format defined in RFC 2629.
That won't help you for non-XMPP specs, though. ;-)

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEW3DgNF1RSzyt3NURAiKdAJ9P8iO9VeyaFGGdmLB3O35h0ypUGQCaAwIf
3r36GDgHQgeANJaZt4ZQ+48=
=Iw5Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060505/70a1901d/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list