[Standards-JIG] pubsub: wrapper or no wrapper for subscription authorizations?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri May 5 16:58:12 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralph Meijer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:15:41PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> In 1.8pre14 I changed it to have a wrapper element (based on some
>> feedback from Peter Millard) but I think it makes sense to change it
>> back unless people can provide a good reason for the wrapper element.
> 
> What was Peter's reasoning about adding the wrapper? It seems to me that
> we used non-wrapped forms here so that clients that have generic
> JEP-0004 support can be used to boot. I don't see the added value of a
> wrapper.

I think his reasoning was that the lack of a wrapper makes it harder for
a client to know the context. But we know the context from the FORM_TYPE
and such, so I think our consensus is that the wrapper is not needed and
version 1.8pre16 will reflect that.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEW4QjNF1RSzyt3NURAl59AJ9/s2yWxY/N0J4I9Xx0om5jbgaa5ACdHWIY
LVycNmO1qktWh4vxZpQjIpE=
=T6dK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060505/e172c3a7/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list