[Standards-JIG] pubsub: wrapper or no wrapper for subscription authorizations?
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri May 5 16:58:12 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Ralph Meijer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:15:41PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> In 1.8pre14 I changed it to have a wrapper element (based on some
>> feedback from Peter Millard) but I think it makes sense to change it
>> back unless people can provide a good reason for the wrapper element.
> What was Peter's reasoning about adding the wrapper? It seems to me that
> we used non-wrapped forms here so that clients that have generic
> JEP-0004 support can be used to boot. I don't see the added value of a
I think his reasoning was that the lack of a wrapper makes it harder for
a client to know the context. But we know the context from the FORM_TYPE
and such, so I think our consensus is that the wrapper is not needed and
version 1.8pre16 will reflect that.
Jabber Software Foundation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards