[Standards-JIG] Re: The Ack Hack.
trejkaz at trypticon.org
Sat May 13 08:36:13 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 13/05/2006, at 18:01 PM, Pavel Šimerda wrote:
> Still whitespace pings are not well documented, and xml pings look
> better to
> me (in the way they are defined in jep-ack). It perfectly
> supplements the
> message acking mechanism. And... I'd be happy to get rid of all
> stuff in the protocol.
I completely agree, the logic would be more reliable using jep-ack,
purely because you then know which stanzas got through. The best you
can ever get with whitespace pings is a few minutes less time where
messages fall into the hole, you can't eliminate the hole itself.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards