[Standards-JIG] Re: The Ack Hack.

Trejkaz trejkaz at trypticon.org
Sat May 13 08:36:13 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 13/05/2006, at 18:01 PM, Pavel Šimerda wrote:
> Still whitespace pings are not well documented, and xml pings look  
> better to
> me (in the way they are defined in jep-ack). It perfectly  
> supplements the
> message acking mechanism. And... I'd be happy to get rid of all  
> whitespace
> stuff in the protocol.

I completely agree, the logic would be more reliable using jep-ack,  
purely because you then know which stanzas got through.  The best you  
can ever get with whitespace pings is a few minutes less time where  
messages fall into the hole, you can't eliminate the hole itself.

TX

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEZZqDuMe8iwN+6nMRAtKkAKCcTooALdAr5kgrOzzN0z5Mrk1WZwCfRvi2
x/PHTM7dj42XigoANRWTEJE=
=f/yC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list