[Standards-JIG] The Ack Hack.
trejkaz at trypticon.org
Sun May 14 01:25:53 UTC 2006
On Sunday 14 May 2006 05:08, Pavel Šimerda wrote:
> On 2006-05-13 17:05, Trejkaz wrote:
> > On 13/05/2006, at 22:09 PM, Michal vorner Vaner wrote:
> > > I did not say most of them does not, but you can not require the
> > > storage. Even if there existed only one client that did not have, it
> > > would not be nice of you to expect it looks usual.
> > Actually, it wouldn't be that bad. It just means that this 1 in 20
> > phone clients wouldn't get reliable delivery. If they wanted it,
> > they could upgrade their phone. Simple.
> None of them will get reliable delivery... there are many cases when last
> id storage fails. Like switching clients or even computers/devices.
> It's good to eliminate duplicate messages, nothing more.....
Look, I know that this won't give reliable delivery all by itself. That would
clearly be ludicrous.
What I said was, if 1 in 20 phone clients can't implement something intrinsic
to whatever protocol we come up with, then that 1 client just won't get
reliable delivery. And that's fine, right? The user can upgrade their
I don't think designing around the concept of having no storage device is a
very smart move these days, when people can walk into a shop and buy a 1GB
memory card for a phone, and there are other phones on the market with *hard
Even TV set-top boxes have internal storage.
Email: trejkaz at trypticon.org
Jabber ID: trejkaz at trypticon.org
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards