[Standards-JIG] jep-0060 $home
bz at datenkueche.com
Tue May 30 16:25:02 UTC 2006
> How is ejabberd doing it? Would this help?
In ejabberd the node attribute isn't an id.
It's more a method like xpath or xpointer or directory+filename to
access a node.
Every user has write access to
Example: pubsub at jaim.at -> /home/jaim.at/pubsub/...
There is a node "home" with a childnode "jaim.at"
"jaim.at" has at the beginning no childnodes but the user "pubsub" has
writeaccess to make a
childnode with the name "pubsub" to the node "jaim.at"...
If an instant node is generates it is generated as
As long as a node is not additional assigned to a collection or an other
node the node attribute is unique and makes sense.
If nodes are moved, it isn't a good idea to take the node attribute as
I did not implement this, but I doubt they use the node attribute as an id.
The "real" id is hidden.
In jep-0060 I couldn't find the information that the node attribute is
For me the ejabberd method makes sense.
They didn't implement collections - but I still don't see the need for
Collections are similar to directories in the filesystem.
If a pubsub subtree is mapped to a big xml structure, collections make
> Would this help?
Don't think so - but I don't really understand it.
looks like mixing namespaces and node name.
More information about the Standards