[Standards-JIG] Re: xmpp.org Namespaces
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Nov 3 22:59:19 UTC 2006
Remko Troncon wrote:
>> I don't really have a problem doing that. They're experimental. The
>> projects in this state are all active, and moving to the new namespaces
>> should be a snap.
> What is the point of having experimental XEPs if you can't change them
> because of existing experimental implementations.
> And also +1 on the URI change proposals.
Well, that raises a broader issue: should Experimental specs use
experimental namespaces and then be "upgraded" once they move to Draft?
Probably not, too confusing. But it would clearly differentiate which
protocols are experimental and which are approved.
Jabber Software Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards