[Standards-JIG] xmpp.org Namespaces

Maciek Niedzielski machekku at uaznia.net
Fri Nov 3 23:03:35 UTC 2006

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> I wrote up an I-D for this while traveling recently:
>>>> http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn-00.txt
>>>> http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn-00.html
>>>> I'll send the template to the URN-NID list soon.
>>> Done:
>>> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg00487.html
>>> No objections have been raised yet. There is a two-week comment period
>>> on the URN-NID list. My understanding is that we probably can begin
>>> using these URNs after the comment period has ended.
>> I guess it will appear here when it's officially ready to use:
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces
> Given that the Namespace ID is defined in an individual submission (not
> the product of an IETF working group), the RFC could take a long time to
> be published, and generally the IANA won't update its assignment page
> until late in the process. But I'll find out more about that from my
> IETF/IANA friends.

If you look at the end of the list, the last registration comes from a
draft, not yet published as RFC.

Maciek                       A: It's against natural order of reading.
 xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net   Q: Why is that?
 xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl   A: People answering above quoted text.
                          Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061104/58f85139/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list