[Standards-JIG] MUC Invitations, Jingle Relays, and Big Problems
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Nov 8 19:36:22 UTC 2006
Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 8 Nov 2006, at 03:02, Justin Karneges wrote:
>> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 5:53 pm, Matt Tucker wrote:
>>> implementation text could state that when chatting with someone not on
>>> your roster, all presence updates are sent as directed presence (so if
>>> you go away, send an away directed presence). More work for the client,
>>> but we don't have to change the RFC language. :)
>> This is quite typical behavior in clients for years now, with MUC
>> rooms for
> Although really, if we want to be consistent across the protocol, we'd
> want a temporary subscription state, which ends with an unavailable
> packet. It's not really a burden for a client to simulate it, but it'd
> be pretty neat to be able to do it in protocol.
Sounds nice in theory, but in practice I doubt we'd see much demand for it.
Jabber Software Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards