[Standards-JIG] Re: blocking namespace

Maciek Niedzielski machekku at uaznia.net
Tue Nov 21 22:30:52 UTC 2006


Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I have been told by an IETF area director that when we start using the
> urn:xmpp: NID is up to us. I would like to start using them as soon as
> possible because the old-style HTTP URIs are problematic for all the
> reasons explained in draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn. Therefore I propose that
> we make XEP-0191 the guinea pig and specify the following namespaces for
> use in simple communications blocking:
> 
> urn:xmpp:blocking
> urn:xmpp:blocking:errors
> 
> Objections?

If this XEP is going to end up as a new RFC chapter, we'll probably have
to change it to urn:ietf:something anyway ;)

-- 
Maciek                       A: It's against natural order of reading.
 xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net   Q: Why is that?
 xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl   A: People answering above quoted text.
                          Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061121/7a2a5f23/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list