[Standards-JIG] Re: blocking namespace

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Nov 21 22:34:09 UTC 2006


Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I have been told by an IETF area director that when we start using the
>> urn:xmpp: NID is up to us. I would like to start using them as soon as
>> possible because the old-style HTTP URIs are problematic for all the
>> reasons explained in draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn. Therefore I propose that
>> we make XEP-0191 the guinea pig and specify the following namespaces for
>> use in simple communications blocking:
>>
>> urn:xmpp:blocking
>> urn:xmpp:blocking:errors
>>
>> Objections?
> 
> If this XEP is going to end up as a new RFC chapter, we'll probably have
> to change it to urn:ietf:something anyway ;)

It won't, because rfc3921bis simply refers to it and I don't see that
changing:

http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-00.html#blocking

/psa


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061121/0ab5efac/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list