[Standards-JIG] NEW: XEP-0199 (XMPP Ping)

Daniel Noll daniel at noll.id.au
Fri Nov 24 09:38:33 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 24/11/2006, at 09:35 AM, Mridul wrote:
> This difference here is that anything which blocks in between will  
> send back a service unavailable iq error.
> The way the jep is phrased - if the client chooses to 'ignore' it,  
> it will just silently blocked : which in itself is a presence leak  
> since it is a behavioural change.

True.  So actually, the client would be better off sending back the  
same error which a server would have sent if they weren't present.

Daniel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFZr2duMe8iwN+6nMRAqj/AKCa4gEvJDLI/8txlAdJGdUUTmCW2ACfUYnZ
zERUfErHnAJAzet5EBe6XfU=
=vsYv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list