[Standards-JIG] Lost password XEP?
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Mon Nov 27 16:59:07 UTC 2006
On 27 Nov 2006, at 16:45, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> I think Psi should either drop to support inband registration
>>>> or support XEP-0077. By implementing inband registration in the
>>>> broken way, it causes more harm than good.
>>> Can you really call it broken? At best, I think you can call it
>> Sorry Justin, but what Psi does is not legacy. I started to help in
>> Gabber development in 2000 and even Gabber at that time did already
>> first fetch the required registration fields using an iq/get in the
>> jabber:iq:register namespace.
> Agreed. That's the right way to do it.
For what it's worth, this is on the TODO for the next Psi version
(Subject to the usual disclaimers about earthquakes, floods and
Psi XMPP Client Project Leader (http://psi-im.org)
More information about the Standards