[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC presence issues
gnauck at ag-software.de
Sat Oct 7 10:36:57 UTC 2006
Michal vorner Vaner wrote:
> Which effectively disallows staying silent for a longer time for people
> with older clients. Or you want to negotiate the keep-alives and use
> them only when supported?
not with Ian's proposal
> And, do you want to have them on the c2s level, or on the MUC level? On
> the MUC level, it would mean every component will soon have its own
> keep-alive mechanism, if on c2s level, if the server 'just disappears',
> you have the same problem, the user stays there.
the solution JD proposed works on c2s level. But this means that the
server would have to take care about all presences to external
components with the user session.
I like both ideas, Ian's and JD's.
More information about the Standards