[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC presence issues
ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Mon Oct 9 15:38:35 UTC 2006
Ian Paterson wrote:
> This version of the probe solution would probably require even less
> state than the groupchat bounce solution, since as soon as I go
> unavailable all state can be forgotten.
In fact no extra state would need to be kept at all. Today servers
already have to remember who they sent directed available presence to in
case I go offline without sending directed unavailable presence.
More information about the Standards