[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC presence issues

Ian Paterson ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Mon Oct 9 15:38:35 UTC 2006


Ian Paterson wrote:
> This version of the probe solution would probably require even less 
> state than the groupchat bounce solution, since as soon as I go 
> unavailable all state can be forgotten.

In fact no extra state would need to be kept at all. Today servers 
already have to remember who they sent directed available presence to in 
case I go offline without sending directed unavailable presence.

- Ian




More information about the Standards mailing list