[Standards-JIG] rfc3920bis, RC4: Version Number Change?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Oct 11 15:27:00 UTC 2006


Justin Karneges wrote:

> I'd like to add that if we do want some minimal feature support for XMPP-IM, 
> then let it be inside XMPP-IM.  For example, the privacy feature could be 
> noted in the IM sessions handshake.  Or we could put an XMPP-IM version in 
> the IM sessions stream feature.  E.g.:
> 
>   <stream:features>
>     <bind xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'/>
>     <session xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-session' version='1.1'/>
>   </stream:features>

Sessions are gone, we removed them because we discovered that they were
unecessary. Just do resource binding and then send presence, that's
enough of a session for most people. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061011/91b2fa7d/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list