[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC presence issues
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Oct 11 18:06:53 UTC 2006
JD Conley wrote:
>> It does not say anything about using this directed presence for a
>> from the recipient subsequently.
> You're exactly correct. We're debating changing the spec in the bis to
> allow for some sort of probe for directed presence due to cross domain
> reliability issues.
I'm going to work more on rfc3921bis this afternoon -- I may put in a
separate section about handling of directed presence so it's easier to grok.
Jabber Software Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards