[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC presence issues

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Oct 11 18:06:53 UTC 2006


JD Conley wrote:
>> It does not say anything about using this directed presence for a
> probe
>> from the recipient subsequently.
> 
> You're exactly correct. We're debating changing the spec in the bis to
> allow for some sort of probe for directed presence due to cross domain
> reliability issues.

Right.

I'm going to work more on rfc3921bis this afternoon -- I may put in a
separate section about handling of directed presence so it's easier to grok.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20061011/ad22e82d/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list