[Standards-JIG] Jingle xeps

Jean-Louis Seguineau jean-louis.seguineau at laposte.net
Thu Oct 12 11:49:49 UTC 2006

I am also personally a little puzzled by what "raw UDP" exactly means. 

Is this 
a) what Matthew calls "udp encapsulated audio", or 
b) what Justin is hinting at, namely RTP.

If the XEP describes case a) we will need another XEP for RTP, as we *must*
have a way to talk P2P with RTP base phones without ICE or a media bridge. 

If the XEP describes case b) then the XEP needs to be changed to better
reflect this.


-----Original Message-----
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:26:53 -0500
From: "Matthew O'Gorman" <mogorman at astjab.org>
Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Jingle xeps
To: "Jabber protocol discussion list" <standards-jig at jabber.org>
	<f49fd40d0610120126r2f05f59cq91296f9e55e89131 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

i was of the understanding raw udp was udp encapsulated audio not rtp
audio there is  a difference. if that is the case it should be changed
i would think


On 10/12/06, Justin Karneges <justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com>
> On Thursday 12 October 2006 00:40, Matthew O'Gorman wrote:
> > Also there is still no xep for raw rtp.  the ice spec is implemented
> > via stun and rtp but there are several possible instances where
> > stunning would not be needed, closed lan, or gatewaying via sip etc.
> That's what the raw UDP spec is for.
> -Justin

More information about the Standards mailing list