[Standards-JIG] XEP0191 - Blocking - Directed Presense

Chris Mullins chris.mullins at coversant.net
Thu Oct 12 22:27:39 UTC 2006


That works just fine for me. 

It closes out that condition, and eliminates potential confusion of
end-users. 

-- 
Chris Mullins



-----Original Message-----
Joe Hildebrand Wrote:

Maybe we could add another rule that says if you unblock, the server  
should also direct all current presences to that user to which that  
user is now entitled?

On Oct 11, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Chris Mullins wrote:

> Let's say a user announces presence.
>
> The server would attempt to send presence to user at otherserver.com, run
> into a block, and get back <not-acceptable/>.
>
> This presence error is then added to the presence error table in the
> server, and no presence packets can be sent here (xmpp requirement).
>
> The remote user then removes the block, but my server isn't going to
> send them prences, as we're in an in-between state. Not until they  
> send
> us presence will the expected results happen. Is this race condition
> acceptable to everyone?
>
> -- 
> Chris Mullins




More information about the Standards mailing list