[Standards-JIG] Re: xmpp.org Namespaces
stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Oct 16 22:26:57 UTC 2006
X- is evil, let's do it right. :-)
The process looks pretty straightforward and I'll write up an I-D about
it before too long...
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> According to RFC 3406, we could just use:
> From section 4.3:
> "The RFC need not be standards-track, but it will be subject to IESG
> review and acceptance pursuant to the guidelines..."
> It looks like Appendix A has all of the stuff that's needed, and that we
> send it to urn-nid at apps.ietf.org to get started.
> But I agree, it makes sense to wait until after the San Diego meeting to
> submit something.
> On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>>> Alternately, we could think about registering a URN namespace here:
>>> And then future namespaces could look like:
>> I think that would be a beautiful thing.
>> One of these days I'll look into it more seriously. We'd need an RFC
>> defining it, and the -00 cutoff date has passed, so there's no huge
>> hurry (probably I'll work on it in a week or two).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards