[Standards-JIG] RFC 3921 Better User PresenceExperience(Implementation Detail)
fippo at goodadvice.pages.de
Fri Oct 27 19:32:32 UTC 2006
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, JD Conley wrote:
>> The important point would be to clearly define the
>> timeouts, and the associated error states.
> Yes! I know we all implement this stuff. Reliability of the network
> would go up quite a bit if the actions to perform and timeouts to wait
> were well defined.
I wonder if adding a retry-strategy (like smtp has) would help much
(instead of bouncing immediately if a remote connect attempt fails).
Does anyone implement this? If so, how long do you wait before retrying?
More information about the Standards