[Standards-JIG] JEP-0136 Message Archiving
m at tthias.eu
Wed Sep 13 15:04:40 UTC 2006
Ian Paterson schrieb:
> Matthias Wimmer wrote:
>> BTW: What are the considerations for choosing the chosen cryptography
>> schemes of JEP-0136?
> Good question. I think they are particularly secure and very simple to
> implement. For example, RSA-KEM is currently the only required
> encapsulation scheme since it is NESSIE-recommended and its security is
> tightly proven (unlike RSA-OAEP or PKCS #1 v1.5).
Okay ... so it seems there is no special reason why we encrypt the data
May I ask another question? Why do we than invent our own definition for
storing encrypted data? Is there any reason to not just use an already
existing standard? I think of "XML Encryption" by the W3C
Matthias Wimmer Fon +49-700 77 00 77 70
Züricher Str. 243 Fax +49-89 95 89 91 56
81476 München http://ma.tthias.eu/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4263 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards