[Standards-JIG] Behaviour when sending a message to a negativepriority resource

Nolan Eakins sneakin at semanticgap.com
Wed Sep 20 16:09:12 UTC 2006

Hash: SHA1

Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> So, there's a bot and a user at the same bare jid, with different
> resources?  That seems like a confusing approach.  If it's a presence
> probe of some kind, it shouldn't need to respond to messages.  If it's a
> normal-style bot, it should have its own identity.

I can see such a situation popping up with a calendar app. I have it
bound to "me at semanticgap.com/calendar", but since I don't ever want any
chat messages going to it I place it with a negative priority. In such a
case, I'll still want it to receive updates contained in message stanzas
and possibly issue message based commands to it: "add 10:00 AM Meeting".

- - Nolan

- --
SemanticGap: To act as one (TM) -- http://www.semanticgap.com/
Instant awareness & messaging * Online presence design
Cross platform and agile development
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sneakin.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 207 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060920/4519fa73/attachment.vcf>

More information about the Standards mailing list