[Standards] IMML

Michal 'vorner' Vaner vorner at ucw.cz
Tue Aug 7 08:18:34 UTC 2007


I'm for the marking of URL or emoticon (not that they would bother me
any more, I disabled emoticons completely and have just text, and urls at
last don't screw the message up).

But I think emphasis is too much for the protocol. Besides, I would do
backwards-compatible protocol (no other element besides xhtml and text,
why send third version of the text). Just an idea:

  <text>This is not a joke ;-) http://notajoke.org</text>
  <IMML:emoticon start='20' length='3'/>
  <IMML:url start='24' length='19'/>

This is a terroristic email. It will explode in 10 minutes, 
if you do not close it in the meantime.

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070807/94d100c9/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list