[Standards] IMML

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Tue Aug 7 20:59:56 UTC 2007

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Justin Karneges wrote:
>> On Monday 06 August 2007 5:33 am, Alex Jones wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 20:05 -0700, Justin Karneges wrote:
>>>> On Sunday 05 August 2007 5:11 pm, Alex Jones wrote:
>>>>> Hi list
>>>>> I am intending to make an XEP of this. Is anyone interested in helping
>>>>> me, as I haven't really got a clue how to write a proper specification.
>>>>> http://spark.us.weej.net/~alex/temp/imml.html
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>> XEP-71 (XHTML-IM), offers a subset of XHTML markup suitable for IM.  This
>>>> should be sufficient, don't you think?
>>> No, for the reasons I specify in my text.
>> XEP-71 is XHTML-IM, not XHTML.  It is a reduced set of markup meant for IM, 
>> with security in mind, and this is essentially what you are proposing.
>> If your ideas have merit, then how about we apply them against XEP-71?  For 
>> example, if we don't want hyperlinks that trick you, we could require that 
>> all <a> hrefs have matching uri and child text in XEP-71.
> IMHO that would be a good item to add to the security considerations in
> XEP-0071.

Some proposed clarifications:



Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7354 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070807/f6f3e55f/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list