[Standards] NEW: XEP-0224 (Attention)
sgolovan at nes.ru
Thu Aug 9 19:36:02 UTC 2007
On 8/9/07, Jakob Schroeter <js at camaya.net> wrote:
> On Thursday August 9 2007, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> > 3) (Theoretical question) If we look at client capabilities XEP (115)
> > we may see that it reaches it's purpose if a features list isn't
> > changed (since the last sent presence at least) and is the same for
> > all members in the user's roster. Is this "floating feature" (which
> > can be switched on/off) really compatible with XEP-0115?
> I'd say yes, the receiving client should re-disco or use a previously cached
> caps hash.
The problem is which hash to include into a presence packet. It should
be different for different recipients. But there's only one presence
More information about the Standards