[Standards] NEW: XEP-0224 (Attention)

Andreas Monitzer jig at monitzer.com
Fri Aug 10 13:24:17 UTC 2007

On Aug 10, 2007, at 15:12, Sergei Golovan wrote:

> You're already use <iq/> to determine XEP support. So, I think that
> anyway the message should be sent to a full JID.
> As for potential memory leak I would say that it's better to leave
> this problem to a client developer. There are always clients, which
> behave incorrectly. Do you want to completely avoid using <iq/>s?

No, but I want a specific reason to use an iq instead of a message.


More information about the Standards mailing list