[Standards] NEW: XEP-0224 (Attention)
jig at monitzer.com
Fri Aug 10 13:24:17 UTC 2007
On Aug 10, 2007, at 15:12, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> You're already use <iq/> to determine XEP support. So, I think that
> anyway the message should be sent to a full JID.
> As for potential memory leak I would say that it's better to leave
> this problem to a client developer. There are always clients, which
> behave incorrectly. Do you want to completely avoid using <iq/>s?
No, but I want a specific reason to use an iq instead of a message.
More information about the Standards