[Standards] NEW: XEP-0224 (Attention)
sgolovan at nes.ru
Fri Aug 10 13:30:24 UTC 2007
On 8/10/07, Andreas Monitzer <jig at monitzer.com> wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2007, at 15:12, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> > You're already use <iq/> to determine XEP support. So, I think that
> > anyway the message should be sent to a full JID.
> > As for potential memory leak I would say that it's better to leave
> > this problem to a client developer. There are always clients, which
> > behave incorrectly. Do you want to completely avoid using <iq/>s?
> No, but I want a specific reason to use an iq instead of a message.
I just want to get a result of attention query. And I don't like to
make many disco#info queries to determine current state of the remote
More information about the Standards