[Standards] Comment to rfc3921 pt 11.1 : handling of messages to ressources with identical priorities
hildjj at gmail.com
Tue Aug 21 17:03:38 UTC 2007
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>> I often find that the people that want what the SIP folks call
>> are either using a client that doesn't set priority to 0 on auto-
> That sounds like a best practice to document somewhere. :)
JD's presence priority stuff was a good start. Perhaps it needs to
be a XEP.
>> are running multiple resources and haven't configured their
>> in any interesting way, or have a server that doesn't make a good
>> on priority ties.
> I'm curious: how frequent are priority ties anyway?
First: how frequent are multiple resources today? I bet that it gets
a little more frequent in the future, but not as frequent as we
thought before we had PEP.
More information about the Standards