[Standards] Comment to rfc3921 pt 11.1 : handling of messages to ressources with identical priorities

Joe Hildebrand hildjj at gmail.com
Tue Aug 21 17:03:38 UTC 2007


On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>> I often find that the people that want what the SIP folks call  
>> "forking"
>> are either using a client that doesn't set priority to 0 on auto- 
>> away,
>
> That sounds like a best practice to document somewhere. :)

JD's presence priority stuff was a good start.  Perhaps it needs to  
be a XEP.

>> are running multiple resources and haven't configured their  
>> priorities
>> in any interesting way, or have a server that doesn't make a good  
>> guess
>> on priority ties.
>
> I'm curious: how frequent are priority ties anyway?

First: how frequent are multiple resources today?  I bet that it gets  
a little more frequent in the future, but not as frequent as we  
thought before we had PEP.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand





More information about the Standards mailing list