[Standards] Comment to rfc3921 pt 11.1 : handling of messages to ressources with identical priorities

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Aug 24 18:12:25 UTC 2007

Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:35:12 +0200 Robin Redeker <elmex at x-paste.de>
> wrote:
>> I actually mostly care about sane and _clear_ and simple semantics
>> for handling cornercases. It clearly defined what users, developers
>> and admins can expect in such cases.
> And until we find a reason against it I thing that broadcasting is
> the simplest way to handle this case :)

So we say you SHOULD do that but you MAY do something smarter if you
think you can. Which I think is what the text says now.


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070824/01661844/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list