[Standards] file transfer

Tomasz Sterna tomek at xiaoka.com
Tue Aug 28 20:42:35 UTC 2007


Dnia 28-08-2007, Wt o godzinie 21:21 +0100, Richard Dobson napisał(a):
> Yes but jingle also provides access to ICE and pseudo-tcp so it would
> be helpful rather than have the entire file transfer negotiation using
> just jingle if it was separated in two so that all the jingle side is
> doing is negotiating a generic bytestream that can be then reused by
> things like SI, to me this seems like a sensible compromise as there
> is no real benefit that I can see of doing the whole thing in jingle
> as its just duplicating effort, whereas creating a new bytestream
> method is complimentory, anyone else think its a good idea?

Me. :-)

+1 for SI/Jingle FT

-- 
Tomasz Sterna
Xiaoka.com  http://www.xiaoka.com/




More information about the Standards mailing list