[Standards] XEP-0138 vs. TLS compression

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Aug 30 15:46:29 UTC 2007


Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> 
> On Aug 29, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Boyd Fletcher wrote:
> 
>> I was thinking we would just add it to XEP-138 instead of writing a
>> new XEP.
> 
> I'm really opposed to changing XEPs to add new features, particularly
> ones that are:
> a) widely deployed
> b) designed to be extensible, with a registry to define the extension
> points
> 
> There's no reason why this can't be a new XEP, and leave the existing
> XEP completely unmodified.

We did add a mention of the LZW method to XEP-0138 (then JEP-0138) in
late 2005, but our approach to updating specificiations was less formal
back then. I agree that a small XEP about this would be appropriate,
then we can add a reference from XEP-0138 to the new spec.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070830/475a4919/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list