[Standards] Threaded chats
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Feb 8 18:30:12 UTC 2007
Jay Carlson wrote:
> What *does* seem to be useful enough is UI to indicate that a given
> speech act is directed at a particular person. In that case, the source
> gets sufficient benefit out of getting the attention of the recipient
> that the source is willing to take additional UI action. For
> bystanders, this also provides threading clues for free.
Agreed. And we have social conventions for that in chatrooms. I don't
particularly see the need for technology on top of that.
> Sometimes the request for threading tools is associated with requests
> for stronger moderation tools, and fine-grained control over who gets to
> speak when. In my opinion, the desire of some organizations to have
> software enforce rules that "in real life" are handled by social
> convention is very revealing. But that's a different rant.
Start a blog and rant away. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards