[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle HTTP File Transfer
jd.conley at coversant.net
Mon Feb 12 23:42:19 UTC 2007
It also doesn't look particularly good at requirement #1 ("This protocol
must work everywhere, regardless of network topology"). XEP-0065 is
heaps better with a proxied connection. I'm actually a bit foggy on the
necessity of this HTTP Jingle profile.
From: standards-bounces at xmpp.org [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Mridul
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 3:07 PM
To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle HTTP File
XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
> Title: Jingle HTTP File Transfer
> Abstract: This document describes a content type used for transferring
files with Jingle, using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol.
> URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-httpft.html
> The XMPP Council will decide within 7 days (or at its next meeting)
whether to accept this proposal as an official XEP.
How is this related to jingle ?
Looks more like a customization to oob ... we could actually fold the
listing/preview into oob (or an extension) such that they are relevant
to other modes of transfer too, not just http.
More information about the Standards