[Standards-JIG] DEFERRED: XEP-0171 (Language Translation)
boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Thu Jan 4 04:05:49 UTC 2007
it would be nice to have it as experimental so they people don't think it is
dead - which it certainly isn't since several folks have working
implementations. I don't understand the rational of moving experimental
stuff to deferred. They purpose of making something experimental is that
people need time to implement it and see if its valid.
On 1/3/07 6:48 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
> Once the spec is updated, feel free to send me a revised version and I
> will move it back to Experimental. The latest XML is here:
> Chris Mullins wrote:
>> I had posted quite a few comments against this XEP a few months back,
>> but never got any responses.
>> When I looked through it (which I did in detail) and applied some use
>> cases to it, there were a number of areas in which it was incomplete.
>> Chris Mullins
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org
>> [mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Boyd Fletcher
>> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 6:46 AM
>> To: XMPP Extension Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] DEFERRED: XEP-0171 (Language Translation)
>> We would like to move it back to experimental. We have a working
>> implementation and their are several others that are work on ones as
>> Just because the XEP isn't changing doesn't mean there is a lack of
>> On 12/7/06 10:16 PM, "XMPP Extensions Editor" <editor at jabber.org> wrote:
>>> XEP-0171 (Language Translation) has been Deferred because of
>>> Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension for
>>> language translation facilities over XMPP. It supports human, machine,
>>> client-based, and server-based translations.
>>> URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0171.html
>>> If and when a new revision of this XEP is published, its status will
>>> changed back to Experimental.
More information about the Standards