[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0186 (Invisible Command)
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jan 31 15:38:46 UTC 2007
Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> I notice that the security considerations here violate the requirement
>> in RFC 3920 to reply to IQs of type get or set. We need to figure that
> Let the server reply to IQs on behalf of the client, as it would when
> it were offline?
Yes, I realized that in the middle of the night. :-) If the client is in
invisible mode, the server replies to IQ set or get on the client's
behalf. But I guess maybe it needs to make an exception if the client
sent directed presence? E.g., Jingle uses all IQs and it wouldn't work
if you were in invisible mode. Hmmm.
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards