[Standards] XEP-0108: registry?
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Jul 5 15:53:08 UTC 2007
Daniel Noll wrote:
>> Daniel Noll wrote:
>>> doesn't really matter to me. They're all phones.
>> If I'm on an audio call, I might be able to IM with you in the
>> background without the other person knowing. But I can't very well get
>> away with that on a video call. So I think the distinction provides
>> useful information wrt my ability to communicate. And that's what
>> extended presence is all about, no?
> Hmm... that could be a thought. Although...
> 1. There are already activities in the list which don't necessarily help
> the other user determine if they can send a message.
Did we say that all activities needed to help other users determine if
it's appropriate to send a message?
> e.g. for
> "gaming", if they're playing Solitaire, I'd say they can respond to
> messages. There are games where they can't.
XEP-0108 is extensible. People can always define more precise
sub-activities if they want to.
We *could* do that with the video phone activity. It's a bit of a
borderline case, but IMHO it's going to be common enough that we want to
define a separate activity for it.
> 2. We already have presence for the other user to determine if I'm
> contactable. i.e. can I not just set DND while on a video call?
XEP-0108 is for things that are much more granular than <show>dnd</show>.
XMPP Standards Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards