[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Getting a User's Attention

Andreas Monitzer jig at monitzer.com
Fri Jul 6 12:59:07 UTC 2007


On Jul 06, 2007, at 14:13, Daniel Noll wrote:

> It may even be desirable to enable this per-user.  Whether this  
> means giving
> different users different disco results or giving the same result and
> silently dropping the packet, I'm not sure.  I think I would prefer  
> the third
> option, the sender getting a not-authorized error back.

Isn't not-authorized an iq result, and thus not applicable for a  
message stanza?

andy




More information about the Standards mailing list