[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Getting a User's Attention
ukv1977 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 17:30:08 UTC 2007
We do this in the below way :
<pda01 at sip.eyeball.com%22%3E%3Cthread%3E38632DAB-0E5F-4F9C-9F5B-D0DA6CB07688%3C/thread%3E%3Cx>
This 'll give a buzz + play the au file at the other side. Another is, we
dont send <body> in this message because already a chat is going and we just
want to play the sound and give a window shake.
On 7/6/07, Daniel Noll <daniel at noll.id.au> wrote:
> On Saturday 07 July 2007 01:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > If the message contains only the attention element (as it certainly
> > should), then the recipient can simply ignore it. It's not necessary to
> > return an error, IMHO.
> To some extent though I'd like to know if I prod someone whose client
> to support the feature, and for some reason they don't get prodded.
> On the other hand you can solve the same problem by telling some users you
> support it and other users you don't. So those other users don't even get
> the button in the first place.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards