[Standards] JID Escaping
ghudson at MIT.EDU
Wed Jul 25 16:21:18 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 21:18 +0530, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
> > That's not true of email; why does it need to be true of XMPP? If a JID
> > node can contain a "@" character in its display representation, there's
> > no nice way to display that JID safely to the user.
> > romeo at firstname.lastname@example.org is perhaps unambiguous but is certainly
> > confusing.
> This is invalid as a JID as per xmpp rfc.
Of course it is. But romeo\40capulet.org at montague.org is to be
displayed that way by clients according to XEP 106. It's right there as
example #8 in section 5.1.
More information about the Standards